Bradley J. Austin
Affiliation confirmed via AI analysis of OpenAlex, ORCID, and web sources.
Researcher
Also affiliated: Shippensburg University (2012); Kent State University (2014); University of Arkansas System (2022–2023)
Faculty Researcher
Arkansas Water Resources Center
Research Areas
Biomedical Subjects
Links
Biography and Research Information
OverviewAI-generated summary
Bradley J. Austin's research focuses on understanding the factors influencing cyanobacterial blooms and microcystin production in aquatic environments, particularly in Arkansas. His work investigates the role of nitrogen form, concentration, and micronutrient availability in the development of these blooms. Austin has explored the correlation between raw fluorescence measurements of chlorophyll and phycocyanin and the presence of cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms (HABs) and associated toxins, using Lake Fayetteville as a case study. He has also examined the variability of total microcystin concentration in water samples and the recommended volumes for sample integrity. His research has extended to assessing the occurrence of microcystin in Ozark streams during baseflow conditions. Additionally, Austin has studied sediment phosphorus release at Lake Fayetteville. His scholarship metrics include an h-index of 7, with 31 total publications and 194 total citations. Key collaborators include Brian E. Haggard and Abbie LaNell Lasater from the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville.
Metrics
- h-index: 7
- Publications: 31
- Citations: 202
Selected Publications
-
Chlorophyll and Phycocyanin Raw Fluorescence May Inform Recreational Lake Managers on Cyanobacterial HABs and Toxins: Lake Fayetteville Case Study (2023)
-
Measurable microcystin in Ozark streams was rare during summer 2018 baseflow conditions (2022)
-
Nitrogen form, concentration, and micronutrient availability affect microcystin production in cyanobacterial blooms (2021)
-
Sediment phosphorus release sustains nuisance periphyton growth when nitrogen is not limiting (2020)
-
Water Chemistry During Baseflow Helps Inform Watershed Management: A Case Study of the Lake Wister Watershed, Oklahoma (2018)
-
Can high volume hydraulic fracturing effects be detected in large watersheds? A case study of the South Fork Little Red River (2018)
-
Establishing the linkages among watershed threats, in-stream alterations and biological responses remains a challenge: Fayetteville Shale as a case study (2018)
-
Unconventional natural gas development did not result in detectable changes in water chemistry (within the South Fork Little Red River) (2017)
-
Do biofilm communities respond to the chemical signatures of fracking? A test involving streams in North-central Arkansas (2017)
-
Stream primary producers relate positively to watershed natural gas measures in north-central Arkansas streams (2015)
-
Stream macroinvertebrate communities across a gradient of natural gas development in the Fayetteville Shale (2015)
Collaboration Network
Top Collaborators
- Nitrogen form, concentration, and micronutrient availability affect microcystin production in cyanobacterial blooms
- Chlorophyll and Phycocyanin Raw Fluorescence May Inform Recreational Lake Managers on Cyanobacterial HABs and Toxins: Lake Fayetteville Case Study
- Measurable microcystin in Ozark streams was rare during summer 2018 baseflow conditions
- Nitrogen form, concentration, and micronutrient availability affect microcystin production in cyanobacterial blooms
- Chlorophyll and Phycocyanin Raw Fluorescence May Inform Recreational Lake Managers on Cyanobacterial HABs and Toxins: Lake Fayetteville Case Study
- Nitrogen form, concentration, and micronutrient availability affect microcystin production in cyanobacterial blooms
- Chlorophyll and Phycocyanin Raw Fluorescence May Inform Recreational Lake Managers on Cyanobacterial HABs and Toxins: Lake Fayetteville Case Study
- Nitrogen form, concentration, and micronutrient availability affect microcystin production in cyanobacterial blooms
- Nitrogen form, concentration, and micronutrient availability affect microcystin production in cyanobacterial blooms
- Nitrogen form, concentration, and micronutrient availability affect microcystin production in cyanobacterial blooms
- Nitrogen form, concentration, and micronutrient availability affect microcystin production in cyanobacterial blooms
- Nitrogen form, concentration, and micronutrient availability affect microcystin production in cyanobacterial blooms
- Nitrogen form, concentration, and micronutrient availability affect microcystin production in cyanobacterial blooms
- Nitrogen form, concentration, and micronutrient availability affect microcystin production in cyanobacterial blooms
- Nitrogen form, concentration, and micronutrient availability affect microcystin production in cyanobacterial blooms
- Nitrogen form, concentration, and micronutrient availability affect microcystin production in cyanobacterial blooms
- Nitrogen form, concentration, and micronutrient availability affect microcystin production in cyanobacterial blooms
- Nitrogen form, concentration, and micronutrient availability affect microcystin production in cyanobacterial blooms
- Nitrogen form, concentration, and micronutrient availability affect microcystin production in cyanobacterial blooms
Similar Researchers
Based on overlapping research topics