Match tier
Listed
Presence
Current · Arkansas
Last published
2022
Sources
OpenAlex · ORCID
Refreshed
2026-10-04
K
K. Montgomery
Role not yet determined Is this you? Add your title
Also affiliated: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (1972); Intel (United States) (2009); Kansas State University (2021–2022); Pratt Institute (2021–2022)
4 h-index
234 pubs
33 cited
Research Areas
Biomedical Subjects
Biography and Research Information
OverviewAI-generated summary
K. Montgomery's research has focused on environmental contaminants and agricultural science, with early work investigating the presence of DDT and dieldrin in watersheds in southern Ontario. Further research explored floral pigmentation in the genus Gossypium, examining how different growing environments influenced flavonoid pigmentation. More recent work includes the development of a platform for testing and comparing real-time decision-support algorithms in mobile environments. Montgomery also has a publication related to cultural resource inventories and archeological investigations in Colorado and Utah. With a career spanning several decades, Montgomery has amassed a significant body of work, indicated by 234 total publications and 33 total citations, and an h-index of 4.
Metrics
- h-index: 4
- Publications: 234
- Citations: 33
Selected Publications
-
A Limit-Fed, High-Energy Diet Fed During the Growing Phase Does Not Negatively Affect Subsequent Feedlot Growth Performance or Carcass Merit Compared to Feeding a Traditional Roughage-Based Diet Ad Libitum During the Growing Phase (2022)
-
Subsequent Carcass Merit of Feedlot Cattle May Be Improved by Limit Feeding a High-Energy Diet During the Backgrounding Phase (2021)
Collaboration Network
Top Collaborators
M. A. Scilacci
Kansas State University (US)
2 shared publications
- Subsequent Carcass Merit of Feedlot Cattle May Be Improved by Limit Feeding a High-Energy Diet During the Backgrounding Phase
- A Limit-Fed, High-Energy Diet Fed During the Growing Phase Does Not Negatively Affect Subsequent Feedlot Growth Performance or Carcass Merit Compared to Feeding a Traditional Roughage-Based Diet Ad Libitum During the Growing Phase
Sean P. Montgomery
Kansas State University (US)
2 shared publications
- Subsequent Carcass Merit of Feedlot Cattle May Be Improved by Limit Feeding a High-Energy Diet During the Backgrounding Phase
- A Limit-Fed, High-Energy Diet Fed During the Growing Phase Does Not Negatively Affect Subsequent Feedlot Growth Performance or Carcass Merit Compared to Feeding a Traditional Roughage-Based Diet Ad Libitum During the Growing Phase
Travis Gene O’Quinn
Kansas State University (US)
2 shared publications
- Subsequent Carcass Merit of Feedlot Cattle May Be Improved by Limit Feeding a High-Energy Diet During the Backgrounding Phase
- A Limit-Fed, High-Energy Diet Fed During the Growing Phase Does Not Negatively Affect Subsequent Feedlot Growth Performance or Carcass Merit Compared to Feeding a Traditional Roughage-Based Diet Ad Libitum During the Growing Phase
Anthony J. Tarpoff
Kansas State University (US)
2 shared publications
- Subsequent Carcass Merit of Feedlot Cattle May Be Improved by Limit Feeding a High-Energy Diet During the Backgrounding Phase
- A Limit-Fed, High-Energy Diet Fed During the Growing Phase Does Not Negatively Affect Subsequent Feedlot Growth Performance or Carcass Merit Compared to Feeding a Traditional Roughage-Based Diet Ad Libitum During the Growing Phase
Evan C. Titgemeyer
Kansas State University (US)
2 shared publications
- Subsequent Carcass Merit of Feedlot Cattle May Be Improved by Limit Feeding a High-Energy Diet During the Backgrounding Phase
- A Limit-Fed, High-Energy Diet Fed During the Growing Phase Does Not Negatively Affect Subsequent Feedlot Growth Performance or Carcass Merit Compared to Feeding a Traditional Roughage-Based Diet Ad Libitum During the Growing Phase
W. R. Hollenbeck
Kansas State University (US)
2 shared publications
- Subsequent Carcass Merit of Feedlot Cattle May Be Improved by Limit Feeding a High-Energy Diet During the Backgrounding Phase
- A Limit-Fed, High-Energy Diet Fed During the Growing Phase Does Not Negatively Affect Subsequent Feedlot Growth Performance or Carcass Merit Compared to Feeding a Traditional Roughage-Based Diet Ad Libitum During the Growing Phase
Dale A. Blasi
Kansas State University (US)
2 shared publications
- Subsequent Carcass Merit of Feedlot Cattle May Be Improved by Limit Feeding a High-Energy Diet During the Backgrounding Phase
- A Limit-Fed, High-Energy Diet Fed During the Growing Phase Does Not Negatively Affect Subsequent Feedlot Growth Performance or Carcass Merit Compared to Feeding a Traditional Roughage-Based Diet Ad Libitum During the Growing Phase
Michelle A. Johnson
Kansas State University
1 shared publication
In database
- Subsequent Carcass Merit of Feedlot Cattle May Be Improved by Limit Feeding a High-Energy Diet During the Backgrounding Phase
C. E. Hissong
Kansas State University
1 shared publication
In database
- Subsequent Carcass Merit of Feedlot Cattle May Be Improved by Limit Feeding a High-Energy Diet During the Backgrounding Phase
Glynn T. Tonsor
Kansas State University (US)
1 shared publication
- Subsequent Carcass Merit of Feedlot Cattle May Be Improved by Limit Feeding a High-Energy Diet During the Backgrounding Phase
Christopher I. Vahl
Kansas State University (US)
1 shared publication
- Subsequent Carcass Merit of Feedlot Cattle May Be Improved by Limit Feeding a High-Energy Diet During the Backgrounding Phase
Daniel U. Thomson
Iowa State University (US)
1 shared publication
- Subsequent Carcass Merit of Feedlot Cattle May Be Improved by Limit Feeding a High-Energy Diet During the Backgrounding Phase
Tyler J Spore
Kansas State University (US)
1 shared publication
- A Limit-Fed, High-Energy Diet Fed During the Growing Phase Does Not Negatively Affect Subsequent Feedlot Growth Performance or Carcass Merit Compared to Feeding a Traditional Roughage-Based Diet Ad Libitum During the Growing Phase
Similar Researchers
Based on overlapping research topics
Reetam Majumder
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
Machine Learning Applications
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Environmental Science Research
Luke A Ahlemeier
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
Environmental Science Research
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Sophie Sward
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
Environmental Science Research
Qiuqiong Huang
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
Machine Learning Applications
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Environmental Science Research
James M. Burke
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
Environmental Science Research
Tina Gray Teague
Arkansas State University
Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
Environmental Science Research