Ruben Michael Ceballos
This is a likely match — the affiliation was inferred from OpenAlex, ORCID, and web sources but has not been fully confirmed. Treat with appropriate caution.
Role not yet determined Is this you? Add your title
Also affiliated: University of Minnesota (2013–2014); University of California, Merced (2024–2026); University of Minnesota Morris (2012–2014)
Research Areas
Biomedical Subjects
Links
Biography and Research Information
OverviewAI-generated summary
Ruben Michael Ceballos's research interests encompass virology, host-virus interactions, and the broader implications of microbial life. His work has investigated the evolutionary dynamics of viruses, including those infecting archaea in extreme environments, and the differential impacts of specific herpesviruses on human neural stem cells. Ceballos has also explored the transmission dynamics of diseases, such as brucellosis between wildlife and livestock, and has contributed to understanding the biogeographic distribution patterns of methanotrophs, suggesting allopatric evolution as a driving factor.
Beyond fundamental virology and microbial ecology, Ceballos's research has extended into areas relevant to public health and education. He has examined the biochemical composition of algae for biofuel production and has studied modifications of cellulose-based biomaterials for biomedical applications. Notably, he has investigated the remote undergraduate research experience during the COVID-19 pandemic, evaluating its effectiveness and the challenges of conducting research at a distance. His work on host-virus evolutionary dynamics is supported by a significant grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF).
Ceballos holds an h-index of 10 with over 1,100 citations across more than 50 publications. He collaborates with several faculty members at the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville, including Yeasin Ahmed, Mercede Furr, Jiali Li, and Haopeng Li.
Metrics
- h-index: 10
- Publications: 58
- Citations: 1,139
Selected Publications
-
PhageTAILor leverages machine learning for phage tail-like elements detection and classification in plant-associated bacteria (2026)
-
BPS2025 - Sensing RNA stability by a silicon nitride nanopore device (2025)
-
Detection of Thermoacidophiles from Yellowstone Hot Spring (2024)
-
Virtually the Same? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Remote Undergraduate Research Experiences (2023)
-
Modifications of cellulose-based biomaterials for biomedical applications (2022)
-
Genomics and cellulolytic, hemicellulolytic, and amylolytic potential of Iocasia fonsfrigidae strain SP3-1 for polysaccharide degradation (2022)
-
Differential Impacts of HHV-6A versus HHV-6B Infection in Differentiated Human Neural Stem Cells (2022)
-
Virtually the same? Evaluating the effectiveness of remote undergraduate research experiences (2022)
-
“How Do We Do This at a Distance?!” A Descriptive Study of Remote Undergraduate Research Programs during COVID-19 (2022)
-
Gene Expression and Data Analysis Pipeline Using Cancer BioPortal in the Classroom † (2021)
-
Comparisons of Catalytic Efficiency during the Reduction of Lignocellulosic Substrates between Free Enzyme and Enzyme bound to Mobile Enzyme Sequestration Platforms (MESP) (2021)
-
Stability Comparisons between Natural versus Engineered Archaeal Heat-Shock Proteins (2021)
-
Modeling Group II Chaperonin “Heat Shock” Protein Structure: pH and temperature dependency Piyasi Ghosh1,2 Vivek Govind Kumar1,3 Mahmoud Moradi3 Ruben Michael Ceballos1,2,4 University of Arkansas, Cell and Molecular Biology Program University of Arkansas, Department of Biological Sciences University of Arkansas, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry Arkansas Center for Space and Planetary Sciences Program (2021)
-
Stability Comparisons between Natural versus Engineered Archaeal Heat‐Shock Proteins (2021)
-
“How do we do this at a distance?!” A descriptive study of remote undergraduate research programs during COVID-19 (2021)
Federal Grants 1 $6,100,000 total
Collaboration Network
Top Collaborators
- Host-Dependent Differences in Replication Strategy of the Sulfolobus Spindle-Shaped Virus Strain SSV9 (a.k.a., SSVK1): Infection Profiles in Hosts of the Family Sulfolobaceae
- Quantifying relative virulence: when μ max fails and AUC alone just is not enough
- Host-dependent differences in replication strategy of the Sulfolobus Spindle-shaped Virus strain SSV9 (a.k.a., SSVK1): Lytic replication in hosts of the family Sulfolobaceae
- Stability Comparisons between Natural versus Engineered Archaeal Heat-Shock Proteins
- Quantifying relative virulence: When μ max fails and AUC alone just isn’t enough
Showing 5 of 6 shared publications
- Host-Dependent Differences in Replication Strategy of the Sulfolobus Spindle-Shaped Virus Strain SSV9 (a.k.a., SSVK1): Infection Profiles in Hosts of the Family Sulfolobaceae
- Host-dependent differences in replication strategy of the Sulfolobus Spindle-shaped Virus strain SSV9 (a.k.a., SSVK1): Lytic replication in hosts of the family Sulfolobaceae
- Anoxygenic phototroph pufLM gene sequences derived from tropical aquatic sampling sites: Diversity, distribution, and phylogenetics
- Isolation and characterization of Anoxygenic phototrophs from shrimp ponds in Thailand
- Host-dependent differences in replication and virion release strategy of the Sulfolobus Spindle-shaped Virus strain SSV9 (a.k.a., SSVK1): Lytic replication in hosts of the family Sulfolobaceae
- Differential Impacts of HHV-6A versus HHV-6B Infection in Differentiated Human Neural Stem Cells
- Stability Comparisons between Natural versus Engineered Archaeal Heat-Shock Proteins
- Stability Comparisons between Natural Archaeal and Engineered Archaeal‐Bacterial Heat‐Shock Protein Subunits (α, β, and β‐cohesin) and their Oligomeric Complexes
- Differential susceptibility of neuronal neurotransmitter phenotypes to HHV6 infection
- Stability Comparisons between Natural versus Engineered Archaeal Heat‐Shock Proteins
- “How Do We Do This at a Distance?!” A Descriptive Study of Remote Undergraduate Research Programs during COVID-19
- Virtually the Same? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Remote Undergraduate Research Experiences
- “How do we do this at a distance?!” A descriptive study of remote undergraduate research programs during COVID-19
- Virtually the same? Evaluating the effectiveness of remote undergraduate research experiences
- “How Do We Do This at a Distance?!” A Descriptive Study of Remote Undergraduate Research Programs during COVID-19
- Virtually the Same? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Remote Undergraduate Research Experiences
- “How do we do this at a distance?!” A descriptive study of remote undergraduate research programs during COVID-19
- Virtually the same? Evaluating the effectiveness of remote undergraduate research experiences
- “How Do We Do This at a Distance?!” A Descriptive Study of Remote Undergraduate Research Programs during COVID-19
- Virtually the Same? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Remote Undergraduate Research Experiences
- “How do we do this at a distance?!” A descriptive study of remote undergraduate research programs during COVID-19
- Virtually the same? Evaluating the effectiveness of remote undergraduate research experiences
- “How Do We Do This at a Distance?!” A Descriptive Study of Remote Undergraduate Research Programs during COVID-19
- Virtually the Same? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Remote Undergraduate Research Experiences
- “How do we do this at a distance?!” A descriptive study of remote undergraduate research programs during COVID-19
- Virtually the same? Evaluating the effectiveness of remote undergraduate research experiences
- “How Do We Do This at a Distance?!” A Descriptive Study of Remote Undergraduate Research Programs during COVID-19
- Virtually the Same? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Remote Undergraduate Research Experiences
- “How do we do this at a distance?!” A descriptive study of remote undergraduate research programs during COVID-19
- Virtually the same? Evaluating the effectiveness of remote undergraduate research experiences
- “How Do We Do This at a Distance?!” A Descriptive Study of Remote Undergraduate Research Programs during COVID-19
- Virtually the Same? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Remote Undergraduate Research Experiences
- “How do we do this at a distance?!” A descriptive study of remote undergraduate research programs during COVID-19
- Virtually the same? Evaluating the effectiveness of remote undergraduate research experiences
- “How Do We Do This at a Distance?!” A Descriptive Study of Remote Undergraduate Research Programs during COVID-19
- Virtually the Same? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Remote Undergraduate Research Experiences
- “How do we do this at a distance?!” A descriptive study of remote undergraduate research programs during COVID-19
- Virtually the same? Evaluating the effectiveness of remote undergraduate research experiences
- “How Do We Do This at a Distance?!” A Descriptive Study of Remote Undergraduate Research Programs during COVID-19
- Virtually the Same? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Remote Undergraduate Research Experiences
- “How do we do this at a distance?!” A descriptive study of remote undergraduate research programs during COVID-19
- Virtually the same? Evaluating the effectiveness of remote undergraduate research experiences
- “How Do We Do This at a Distance?!” A Descriptive Study of Remote Undergraduate Research Programs during COVID-19
- Virtually the Same? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Remote Undergraduate Research Experiences
- “How do we do this at a distance?!” A descriptive study of remote undergraduate research programs during COVID-19
- Virtually the same? Evaluating the effectiveness of remote undergraduate research experiences
- “How Do We Do This at a Distance?!” A Descriptive Study of Remote Undergraduate Research Programs during COVID-19
- Virtually the Same? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Remote Undergraduate Research Experiences
- “How do we do this at a distance?!” A descriptive study of remote undergraduate research programs during COVID-19
- Virtually the same? Evaluating the effectiveness of remote undergraduate research experiences
- “How Do We Do This at a Distance?!” A Descriptive Study of Remote Undergraduate Research Programs during COVID-19
- Virtually the Same? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Remote Undergraduate Research Experiences
- “How do we do this at a distance?!” A descriptive study of remote undergraduate research programs during COVID-19
- Virtually the same? Evaluating the effectiveness of remote undergraduate research experiences
- “How Do We Do This at a Distance?!” A Descriptive Study of Remote Undergraduate Research Programs during COVID-19
- Virtually the Same? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Remote Undergraduate Research Experiences
- “How do we do this at a distance?!” A descriptive study of remote undergraduate research programs during COVID-19
- Virtually the same? Evaluating the effectiveness of remote undergraduate research experiences
Similar Researchers
Based on overlapping research topics