Pia Pennekamp
Affiliation confirmed via AI analysis of OpenAlex, ORCID, and web sources.
post-doctoral fellow at the University o
Also affiliated: Thompson Rivers University (2020–2021); Queen Margaret University (2024); Centre for Social Sciences (2024)
Postdoc Researcher
Research Areas
Biomedical Subjects
Links
Biography and Research Information
OverviewAI-generated summary
Pia Pennekamp’s research investigates factors influencing eyewitness testimony, including confidence judgments and their relationship to accuracy. Her work examines how verbal and numeric confidence ratings impact decision-making processes in legal contexts. Pennekamp has explored laypeople's interpretations of 'high confidence' statements and developed evidence-based approaches for communicating eyewitness confidence. This research contributes to understanding the reliability of eyewitness accounts and improving communication within the justice system. She has a h-index of 4 with 15 publications and 57 citations. Pennekamp collaborates with James Michael Lampinen on shared publications.
Metrics
- h-index: 4
- Publications: 24
- Citations: 63
Selected Publications
-
Numeric and verbal eyewitness confidence: order effects (2026)
-
Using live-action 360-degree video to assess the impact of exposure duration on eyewitness identification accuracy at high confidence in children and adults (2025)
-
Effects of Jury Warnings on Perceptions of Eyewitness Credibility and Defendant Guilt (2025)
-
Verbal and Numeric Eyewitness Confidence Differentially Affect Decision‐Making (2025)
-
Eyewitness Confidence Does Not Necessarily Indicate Identification Accuracy (2024)
-
Variability in verbal eyewitness confidence (2024)
-
Laypeople’s interpretations of ‘high confidence’ (2024)
Collaboration Network
Top Collaborators
- Variability in verbal eyewitness confidence
- Laypeople’s interpretations of ‘high confidence’
- Eyewitness Confidence Does Not Necessarily Indicate Identification Accuracy
- Using live-action 360-degree video to assess the impact of exposure duration on eyewitness identification accuracy at high confidence in children and adults
- Eyewitness Confidence Does Not Necessarily Indicate Identification Accuracy
- Using live-action 360-degree video to assess the impact of exposure duration on eyewitness identification accuracy at high confidence in children and adults
- Eyewitness Confidence Does Not Necessarily Indicate Identification Accuracy
- Using live-action 360-degree video to assess the impact of exposure duration on eyewitness identification accuracy at high confidence in children and adults
- Variability in verbal eyewitness confidence
- Effects of Jury Warnings on Perceptions of Eyewitness Credibility and Defendant Guilt
- Using live-action 360-degree video to assess the impact of exposure duration on eyewitness identification accuracy at high confidence in children and adults
- Using live-action 360-degree video to assess the impact of exposure duration on eyewitness identification accuracy at high confidence in children and adults
- Using live-action 360-degree video to assess the impact of exposure duration on eyewitness identification accuracy at high confidence in children and adults
- Using live-action 360-degree video to assess the impact of exposure duration on eyewitness identification accuracy at high confidence in children and adults
- Using live-action 360-degree video to assess the impact of exposure duration on eyewitness identification accuracy at high confidence in children and adults
Similar Researchers
Based on overlapping research topics