Meta-Analysis And Systematic Reviews
648 researchers across 15 institutions
Researchers synthesize existing evidence to answer critical questions through meta-analysis and systematic reviews. This work involves rigorously identifying, evaluating, and integrating findings from multiple independent studies on a specific topic. Methodologies include developing clear research questions, conducting comprehensive literature searches, assessing the quality of included studies, and employing statistical techniques to combine data and estimate overall effects. Areas of focus range from clinical interventions and diagnostic accuracy to public health strategies and social science interventions.
This research is particularly relevant to Arkansas's health landscape, informing evidence-based practices in areas like rural health, chronic disease management, and health disparities. By consolidating findings from studies conducted within and outside the state, meta-analyses and systematic reviews help identify effective approaches to improve health outcomes for Arkansas residents. The work supports policymakers and healthcare providers in making informed decisions about resource allocation and program development, contributing to the state's public health goals and economic well-being through improved population health.
This field draws upon and contributes to numerous disciplines, including health disparities and outcomes, public health, retrospective studies, and behavioral and psychological research. Engagement spans multiple Arkansas institutions, reflecting a broad commitment to evidence synthesis across the state.
Top Researchers
| Name | Institution | h-index | Citations | Career Stage | Badges |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter S. Jensen | UAMS | 106 | 37,440 | Faculty | High Impact |
| Kenneth Wilson | University of Arkansas | 76 | 22,931 | Emeritus | High Impact |
| Katherine J. Willis | Arkansas State University | 76 | 28,352 | ||
| Maurizio Zangari | UAMS | 71 | 19,736 | Faculty | High Impact |
| Alejandro Arias Vásquez | University of Arkansas | 68 | 22,469 | Faculty | |
| Barry F. Uretsky | UAMS | 68 | 32,229 | Faculty | High Impact |
| Stacie M. Jones | UAMS | 68 | 22,773 | Faculty | High Impact |
| Margaret May | UAMS | 66 | 19,265 | High Impact | |
| Naveena Singh | Arkansas Colleges of Health Education | 64 | 16,943 | High Impact | |
| Everett F. Magann | UAMS | 62 | 12,793 | Faculty | High Impact |
| Jeannette Y. Lee | UAMS | 58 | 10,428 | Faculty | High Impact |
| Yong‐Moon Park | UAMS | 53 | 9,999 | Faculty | Grant PI High Impact |
| Mary C. Lacity | University of Arkansas | 53 | 12,794 | ||
| Harry Anthony Patrinos | University of Arkansas | 51 | 12,687 | Faculty | High Impact |
| Matthew T. Feldner | University of Arkansas | 51 | 7,828 | High Impact | |
| Benjamin Amick | UAMS | 50 | 16,726 | Faculty | Grant PI |
| Bradley C. Martin | UAMS | 47 | 10,445 | Faculty | High Impact |
| Colin D. Kay | UAMS | 45 | 9,157 | Faculty | High Impact |
| Christopher C. Rosen | University of Arkansas | 45 | 10,252 | Faculty | High Impact |
| Nickolas D Zaller | UAMS | 43 | 6,272 | Faculty | High Impact |
Related Research Areas
Strategic Outlook
Global signals from OpenAlex for this research area: where the field is growing, how concentrated leadership is, and where Arkansas sits relative to the world's top-100 institutions. Descriptive only — surfaced as input to the conversation about where to place bets, not a recommendation. Signal confidence: LOW
Top US institutions in this area
- 1 Harvard University 1,669
- 2 Stanford University 1,288
- 3 Johns Hopkins University 1,202
- 4 University of Washington 928
- 5 McMaster University 917
Cross-Institution Connections
Researchers at different institutions with overlapping expertise in Meta-Analysis And Systematic Reviews.