Structure-Activity Relationship
21 researchers across 4 institutions
This research area explores how the three-dimensional structure of molecules influences their biological activity. Scientists investigate the relationships between a molecule's chemical structure and its effects on living systems, seeking to understand how modifications to molecular architecture can alter function, efficacy, and potential side effects. This involves a range of methodologies, including synthesis of novel compounds, biochemical assays, biophysical characterization, and computational modeling. Key sub-fields include the design of new therapeutic agents, understanding molecular recognition processes, and predicting the behavior of chemicals in biological environments.
Research in structure-activity relationships holds significant relevance for Arkansas. It directly supports the state's growing biopharmaceutical and agricultural technology sectors by enabling the development of more effective and safer drugs, pesticides, and other bioactive compounds. Understanding these relationships can also inform public health initiatives by providing insights into the mechanisms of disease and the development of targeted treatments, potentially addressing health disparities within the state. Furthermore, it contributes to the responsible development and application of chemical products, aligning with Arkansas's diverse natural resources and industrial landscape.
This field is inherently interdisciplinary, drawing upon expertise from chemistry, biology, pharmacology, and computer science. Active research programs across multiple Arkansas institutions foster collaboration and leverage a diverse range of experimental and theoretical approaches. This broad engagement strengthens the state's capacity to address complex challenges in medicine, agriculture, and environmental science.
Top Researchers
| Name | Institution | h-index | Citations | Career Stage | Badges |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henry Ν. C. Wong | UAMS | 48 | 9,262 | High Impact | |
| William E. Fantegrossi | UAMS | 41 | 5,170 | Grant PI High Impact | |
| Sunil Sharma | UAMS | 37 | 4,990 | High Impact | |
| Robert Griffin | UAMS | 34 | 4,771 | Grant PI High Impact | |
| Brendan Frett | UAMS | 24 | 1,455 | High Impact | |
| Mohammad A. Alam | Arkansas State University | 22 | 1,105 | Grant PI High Impact | |
| Prabhash Nath Tripathi | UAMS | 20 | 1,728 | High Impact | |
| Ahmad Mani‐Varnosfaderani | UAMS | 18 | 999 | ||
| Robert S. Shelton | UAMS | 13 | 525 | ||
| Anupreet Kharbanda | UAMS | 12 | 454 | ||
| Shobanbabu Bommagani | UAMS | 7 | 271 | ||
| Gregory R. Naumiec | University of Central Arkansas | 6 | 223 | ||
| Phuc Tran | UAMS | 6 | 157 | ||
| Colin Bright | University of Arkansas | 5 | 160 | ||
| Amal Shoeib | UAMS | 5 | 71 | ||
| Baha’a Jabali | UAMS | 4 | 110 | ||
| Maha Hanafi | UAMS | 3 | 92 | ||
| Hansa Raj K. C. | Arkansas State University | 1 | 24 | ||
| Jared Hastings | Arkansas State University | 1 | 16 | ||
| Ahmed D. Iqbal | Arkansas State University | 1 | 10 |
Related Research Areas
Strategic Outlook
Global signals from OpenAlex for this research area: where the field is growing, how concentrated leadership is, and where Arkansas sits relative to the world's top-100 institutions. Descriptive only — surfaced as input to the conversation about where to place bets, not a recommendation. Signal confidence: LOW
Top US institutions in this area
- 1 Tulane University 417
- 2 National Cancer Institute 407
- 3 University of Florida 377
- 4 National Institutes of Health 375
- 5 Howard University 321
Cross-Institution Connections
Researchers at different institutions with overlapping expertise in Structure-Activity Relationship.